Policy liaison initiative: Relevant and accessible evidence from The Cochrane Library
Logo for Australasian Cochrane Centre
Arthritis & Musculoskeletal Asthma Cancer Cardiovascular Diabetes Injury Mental Health

Policy liaison home
Review summaries
Cochrane & Asthma
Topics & Reviews
Review summaries
Australia's contribution 
Impact on health care
Research priorities

Other policy relevant Cochrane work 
Effective Practice and Organisation of Care
Consumers and Communication 
Evidence-Based Policy Network 
About the EBPN
Events
Bulletin - latest news

Helpdesk for EBPN
Resources 
Cochrane Library logon
NICS Cochrane Library guide
Australasian Cochrane Centre
National Health Priority Areas website


Why Asthma?

The prevalence of asthma has increased in recent years, with over two million (11%) Australians affected, including:

  • one in four primary school children
  • one in seven adolescents
  • one in ten adults

Asthma is a major cause of school absenteeism, child emergency department attendance and admission to hospital. More than 60,000 Australians are admitted to hospital annually due to asthma.  Up to 60% of asthma deaths may be associated with avoidable factors.  Asthma was included as a National Health Priority Area in 1999 in recognition of the significant burden it places on the Australian community (NHPA website).


Impact of Cochrane on health care - Australia and beyond

Australia
Management of Asthma in Australia has been informed by a strong evidence base.  Australia's consensus treatment guidelines for asthma, the Asthma Management Handbook, draws on the findings of 35 Cochrane reviews and has been used as the basis for the Federally funded Asthma 3+ Visit Plan.

 

The following documents provide examples of the potential of embedding Cochrane reviews in policy making processes, and may provide a model that could be implemented in other areas of healthcare:

The Asthma 3+ visit plan

The Asthma 3+ Visit Plan is a Federal Government funded initiative to improve the management of moderate to severe asthma in general practice settings.  Incentives for general practitioners to implement the plan are provided through the Practice Incentive Program.  Three years of funding was provided for this initiative in the 2001 Federal budget. 

The plan is based on a partnership between GP and patient in which diagnosis, development of a written action plan and education and review are covered in three consultations (or more).  The plan was developed and evaluated by the National Asthma Council.  Adapted from the Six Step Asthma Management Plan, it draws on the findings of Cochrane reviews and other sources. 

Reviews that have have been used to develop this plan include: 

The National Asthma Action Plan 1999-2002

The National Asthma Action Plan 1999-2002 was produced as part of the National Health Priority Initiative to set targets for national asthma activity.  It has 6 key strategies and explicitly requires evidence-based approaches:

  1. Development of agreed national guidelines and tools for asthma management, prevention and early diagnosis based on evidence and consumer needs

  2. Wide dissemination and evidence-based implementation of guidelines and tools

  3. Integration of care based on guidelines, tools and consumer needs

  4. Evaluation of the processes used to develop, disseminate and implement guidelines and tools

  5. Extension of understanding and knowledge of asthma through research and access to quality information

The Asthma Management Handbook

The Asthma Management Handbook 2002, produced by the National Asthma Council, cited 35 asthma reviews from The Cochrane Library.  The Handbook's recommendations are based on the most up-to-date evidence available sourced from 1999 Evidence-Based Review of the Australian Six Step Asthma Management Plan, subsequent Cochrane reviews and other meta-analyses. 

The Evidence-Based Review of the Six Step Asthma Management plan provides one of the clearest examples of how Cochrane reviews can be used to inform health care policy and clinical practice. 

1999 Evidence-Based Review of the Australian Six Step Asthma Management Plan

The 1999 Evidence-Based Review of the Australian Six Step Asthma Management Plan, conducted by Jennifer Coughlan, Amanda Wilson and Peter Gibson for the NSW Health Department, demonstrates the full potential of embedding Cochrane reviews in policy making processes.

The reviewers: 

  • Developed and prioritized 150 questions relevant to the Australian Asthma Management Plan (now the Asthma Management Handbook)
  • Used existing Cochrane reviews to answer questions
  • Published five new Cochrane reviews to answer questions
  • Generated a list of priority questions which they sent to the Cochrane Airways Review Group and  resulted in production of seven new reviews
  • Generated a set of clinically important questions where there were gaps in primary research 

Examples of Cochrane reviews used in the review of the Asthma Management Plan include:

These reviews appear in the "Summaries of Cochrane reviews" report published on this site.

International

Thirty one different Airways Group reviews were cited in the updated British Guideline on the Management of Asthma which represents nearly 45% of asthma reviews on The Cochrane Library.

The Guideline was updated using evidence based methodology and was produced jointly by the British Thoracic Society (BTS) and The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) in collaboration with the National Asthma Campaign, the Royal College of Physicians of London, the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, General Practice Airways group, and the British Association of Accident & Emergency Medicine.
(source: Arnold EM, Cates CJ, Lasserson TJ, Malouf R, Tracy S Airways Group . In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)
Last updated 05 Dec 2006

This website is produced and maintained  by the Australasian Cochrane Centre for members of the Evidence-Based Policy Network, Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.